1 Valentina Pomper Vragović
2,3,4 Marin Mamić
5 Marijana Neuberg
1 Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
2 General County Hospital Požega, Požega, Croatia
3 Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
4 Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek,
Josip Juraj Strossmayer University in Osijek, Osijek, Croatia
5 University North, Koprivnica, Croatia Article received: 17.12.2024.
Article accepted: 26.02.2025. https://doi.org/10.24141/2/9/1/5
Author for correspondence:
Marin Mamić Tome Matica 20
34000 Požega, Croatia
Keywords: emotional competence, nursing, self-esteem
Results. The results showed that significantly more respondents have high self-esteem, 254 of them (83%) (p<0,001). In order to determine the predic- tors of self-esteem, a linear regression analysis was performed. The results showed that the mentioned variables significantly explain 36,9% of the vari- ance in self-esteem (Adjusted R2=0,369, p<0.001). The variables which included emotional competence (p<0.001), professional qualifications (p=0.017) and length of service (p=0.019) were found to be signifi- cant. Looking at the β coefficient, it is clear that all of the above variables contribute positively to self- esteem in nurses.
Self-esteem involves an emotional evaluation of oneself (1). It represents the assessment of a per- son’s beliefs and feelings regarding their abilities and self-worth (2). It can also be understood as a person- al judgment of one’s value as an individual (3).
The formation of self-esteem starts in childhood and adolescence, however various individual, environmen- tal, and social factors significantly influence its devel- opment (4). It is the product of interactions with sig- nificant others such as parents, siblings, friends and the environment in general, and is therefore deter- mined by the quality of interactions and experiences
(4). Parental and peer support, self-rated competence in important areas, and the person’s attachment play a major role in the development of self-esteem in a per- son (5). Conversely, low self-esteem may arise from inadequate maternal acceptance, as well as from be- ing exposed to negative social environments. Factors such as a history of child abuse, critical feedback from important individuals regarding one’s abilities, and family conflicts and dysfunction can play a role in the formation of low self-esteem (6). Alternative causes of low self-esteem include discrepancies between various aspects of oneself, such as the gap between one’s ideal self and actual self. Children exhibit lower self-esteem if they perceive themselves as not com- petent in a subject during their education and place less value on it (7).
The importance of self-esteem in nursing can be seen through the improvement of the process of psycho- logical resilience (8). Research to date has demon- strated that during the COVID 19 pandemic, resilience was influenced by various personal characteristics, including self-esteem (9). On the other hand, im- paired self-esteem can lead to adverse psychological
consequences, such as poor social interactions and a reduced ability to cope with challenges (10). Addition- ally, strong self-esteem in nurses reflects authentic- ity and signifies their capability to employ empathy, foster collaboration, and build positive relationships with both patients and peers (11). Self-esteem plays a pivotal role in linking work responsibilities to job satis- faction and overall performance (12).
Emotional competence serves as a crucial asset for promoting human growth (13) and can be defined as ‘the ability to successfully attain adaptive goals in situations that evoke strong emotions’ (14). Emo- tional competence refers to the ability to success- fully apply the principles of emotional intelligence in everyday situations to effectively manage teams, build interpersonal relationships, and interact posi- tively with individuals and groups (15). Therefore, emotional competence is an important prerequisite for healthy and mutually beneficial social relation- ships (14). The very emergence and development of emotional competence begins in childhood, where children are most favored through supportive and nurturing interactions and environments from par- ents, and later from teachers (16).
Emotional competence may be important for nursing, where nurses operate daily in emotionally demand- ing situations that include caring for patients, their families, and working in multidisciplinary teams (17). According to research, emotional competence allows nurses to better understand and manage their own emotions (17,18). Through the effective control of emotions and the development of positive relation- ships, emotional competence enables nurses to pro- vide better quality and more humane health care, but also to build better interpersonal relationships with colleagues (17).
As the role of emotional competence in building self-esteem has not been researched sufficiently, research has mainly been based on emotional intel- ligence, which is not the same construct as emo- tional competence. The relationship between these two constructs is known, but not in the direction of emotional competence - self-esteem, but vice versa, where it has been shown that low self-esteem can
be a cause of psychological distress and can reduce the emotional competence of the subject. Enhancing self-esteem would boost the chances of developing emotional competence, indicating that the individual would function effectively within their environment
(19). As seen earlier, both constructs are important in interpersonal relationships that are the core of any helping profession, including nursing. Therefore, it is important to explore the relationships between the above constructs in order to gain a more detailed in- sight into their interaction among nurses.
To examining self-esteem in nurses
To examine the contribution of sociodemo- graphic and job-related variables and emotion- al competence to self-esteem in nurses.
A cross-sectional study was conducted. The study in- volved a total of 306 nurses who took part in the re- search. The study was conducted from July to August 2021 via Google Forms. In order to recruit respond- ents, the questionnaire was shared via social network groups (Viber, WP, Facebook, Instagram). The objective of the research was clarified to the participants in the opening section, where they were guaranteed com- plete anonymity. This was achieved by ensuring that no personal data from the respondents was collected. All respondents also had to consent to the study in the first question. To ensure that respondents did not re- spond to the questionnaire multiple times, they were required to register using their email; however, no email addresses were stored. Additionally, to confirm that participants resided in the Republic of Croatia and were employed as nurses, two verification questions were included after obtaining consent: ‘Do you live in the territory of the Republic of Croatia?’ and ‘Are you an employed nurse?’.
A questionnaire consisting of three parts was used in the study.
The first part related to sociodemographic questions: gender, age, marital status, education, and manage- rial position at work.
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSS) comprises ten statements that assess overall self-esteem. Par- ticipants respond to these statements using a five- point Likert scale (1 = I totally disagree to 5 = I totally agree), and the overall score is determined by adding together the responses for all ten statements. Five of the items are in the positive direction and five in the negative direction, the negative ones had to be recoded, i.e. they are scored in reverse. The total is the sum of all responses and the possible range is from 10 to 50, with a higher number indicating higher self-esteem. Self-esteem scores can also be categorized in a way where a score of less than 23 indicates low self-esteem, 23 - 34 indicates average self-esteem, and a score greater than 34 indicates high self-esteem (20). The reliability coefficient for RSS on the sample of this study is 0,86.
The Emotional Competence Questionnaire (UEK-15) is made up of 15 items that form a single component. Respondents evaluate their answers using a five- point Likert-type scale (1 = not at all, 5 = completely YES), and the total score is calculated by adding the scores of all items. Scores can range from 15 to 75, with a higher score reflecting a greater level of emo- tional competence (21). The reliability coefficient for the UEK-15 in this study’s sample is 0.88.
Descriptive statistical methods were used to describe the frequency distribution of the examined variables. Numerical data were described by arithmetic mean, range and standard deviation. Normality of distribu- tion of numerical variables was tested by Kolmogo- rov-Smirnov test (p>0.05). Linear regression analysis (enter method), was performed to determine the pre- dictors of self-esteem (VIF = 1,027 – 4,623; Durbin
-Watson 1,536). The Chi-square test (χ2 test) was uti- lized to assess if there was a significant variation in the distribution of categorical variables. To avoid Type I error, the Bonferonni correction (0.05/3 = 0.0166) was used for the Chi-square test, and a significant statistical difference was considered to be a value
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the participants | ||
N (%) | ||
Gender | male | 21 (6.9) |
female | 285 (93.1) | |
Age | 18 - 24 | 30 (9.8) |
25 - 34 | 96 (31.4) | |
35 - 44 | 98 (32) | |
45 - 54 | 57 (18.6) | |
55 and older | 25 (8.2) | |
Professional qualification | secondary education | 96 (31.4) |
higher education | 150 (49) | |
University, college | 60 (19.6) | |
< 1 | 16 (5.2) | |
Length of employment in the profession | 1 - 5 | 59 (19.3) |
6 - 15 | 74 (24.2) | |
16 - 25 | 74 (24.2) | |
26 and more | 81 (26.5) | |
Management position | yes | 57 (18.6) |
no | 249 (81.4) | |
Note: n – Number of respondents, % - Percentage |
less than p<0.016. In order to determine the con- nection between Self-esteem and sociodemographic variables and emotional competence, Pearson (emo- tional competence), Spearman (professional qualifi- cation, length of employment in the profession, age) and Point Biserial correlations (gender, management position) were used. A significance level for regres- sion analysis of p<0.05 was adopted. The G*Power software indicated that at least 85 participants, with 4 predictors, were necessary to achieve a test power of 0.8 for linear regression analysis. As 306 respond- ents participated in the study, this criterion was also met. The statistical package JASP, version 0.19.3 was used for data processing.
In the studied sample, the majority of respondents were female (285, 93.1%), aged 35 to 44 (98, 32%),
with higher education (150, 49%), with 26 or more years of work experience (81, 26.5%), not in man- agement positions (249, 81.4%) (Table 1).
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of UEK 15 and RSS scale results | ||
M (range) | SD | |
Self-esteem | 40.810 (20 – 50) | 6.469 |
Emotional competence | 61.281 (39 – 75) | 7.635 |
Note: M –Mean, SD - Standard Deviation |
Arithmetic mean of Self-Esteem (RSS) was M=40.810, while that of emotional competence was M=61.281. The results of both self-esteem and emotional com- petence in this sample are high (Table 2).
Table 3. Distribution of RSS scale scores | ||
Self-esteem | N (%) | |
low | 2 (0.7) | |
average | 50 (16.3) | |
highly | 254 (83) | |
χ2 | p* | |
low - average | 44.308 | <0.001 |
low - highly | 248.063 | <0.001 |
average - highly | 136.895 | <0.001 |
Notes: n – Number of respondents, % - Percentage, * Chi square test |
The results showed that the highest number of re- spondents was in the high self-esteem group (254, 83%). It was also shown that there were significantly more respondents with high self-esteem compared to respondents with average (p<0.001) and low self- esteem (p<0.001), and significantly more respond- ents with average compared to low self-esteem (p<0.001) (Table 3).
The results showed that self-esteem is low posi- tively related to the age of the examinee (p=0.002), professional education (p=0.005) and length of ser- vice in the profession (p=0.001), while it is moder- ately positively related to emotional competence (p<0.001) (Table 4).
Table 4. Association of self-esteem with sociodemographic variables and emotional competence | ||
Self-Esteem | ||
Gender | rpb | -0.076 |
p | 0.185 | |
Age | ρ | 0.173 |
p | 0.002 | |
Professional qualification | ρ | 0.159 |
p | 0.005 | |
Length of employment in the profession | ρ | 0.195 |
p | 0.001 | |
Management position | rpb | -0.112 |
p | 0.051 | |
Emotional competence | r | 0.569 |
p | <0.001 | |
Notes: r - Pearson correlation coefficient; rpb - Point Biserial correlations; ρ - Spearman correlations; p – Statistical significance; |
length of service (p=0.019) were found to be signifi- cant predictors. Looking at the β coefficient, it is clear that all of the above variables contribute positively to self-esteem in nurses (Table 5).
Table 5. Results of regression analysis – Self-esteem as a dependent variable | ||||
Multivariate analysis | β | t | p | Adjusted R2 |
(Constant) | 3.376 | 0.001 | 0.361 | |
Emotional competence | 0.542 | 11.705 | <0.001 | |
Age | -0.051 | -0.520 | 0.604 | |
Professional qualification | 0.112 | 2.407 | 0.017 | |
Length of employment in the profession | 0.231 | 2.355 | 0.019 | |
Note: p - statistical significance; β - regression coefficient; t - the size of the difference relative to the variation in sample data; Adjusted R2 – Adjusted coefficient of determination |
Table 5 shows the results of the regression analysis, where self-esteem was taken as the dependent vari- able, while the independent variables were those that proved to be significant in correlations with self-es- teem (Table 3), age, professional education, length of service in the profession and emotional competence. The variables included significantly explain 36.9% of the variance in self-esteem (Adjusted R2=0.361, p<0.001). The variables of emotional competence (p<0.001), professional qualifications (p=0.017) and
One objective of this research was to assess the self- esteem levels among a group of nurses. The findings revealed that a notably larger number of nurses pos- sess high self-esteem. These results align with ear- lier studies conducted on nurse populations, which indicated elevated self-esteem levels (22, 23). A po- tential explanation for these findings could be that, even with their concerns, nurses diligently persist in delivering health care services and engaging in vari- ous professional tasks, potentially enhancing their self-esteem.
Due to emotionally demanding workplace of nurses, including dealing with difficult moments in the lives of patients, chronic illnesses and death, self-esteem serves as a crucial protective factor, safeguarding nurses from psychological harm (22). In such condi- tions, high self-esteem is important because it pro- vides resilience and allows easier handling of work challenges (22). Self-esteem of individuals can lead to their self-confidence, socialization and good re- lations with other people (24), and can influence a person’s professional behavior, better coping with professional challenges. It encourages motivation to achieve professional goals and contributes to a more positive approach to work (24). That is why it is im- portant for health professionals to pay attention to self-esteem, and to continuously monitor and work on its improvement, because not only will they have better and more motivated employees, they will also be healthier due to reduced risk of burnout (24).
One of the goals of this research was to explore how sociodemographic and business factors, along with emotional competence, relate to self-esteem among nurses. It was shown that significant predictors of self-esteem in nurses, in addition to sociodemo- graphic variables, were professional qualifications and length of employment in the profession. The re- sults are consistent with previous research (25 - 28),
which showed that there is a positive relationship between academic success and self-esteem. How- ever, it should be noted that the aforementioned re- search was not conducted on samples of nurses. The reasons for the aforementioned results could be that higher education provides a sense of achievement and competence in nurses, which can be an impor- tant factor in self-esteem (29).
Another significant predictor of self-esteem among sociodemographic variables was the length of work experience. This outcome may be explained through the Conservation of Resources (COR) principle (30), which states that someone with high self-esteem may also act in ways to protect this resource, such as working hard to succeed at work, gaining approval from superiors and coworkers, and avoiding highly stressful situations at work (31).
It is also possible that people with higher self-es- teem tend to behave more openly, which helps them build and maintain positive interpersonal relation- ships, thus increasing their sense of connection with others. On the other hand, people with lower self-es- teem often show reservedness to protect themselves from possible emotional rejection (32). The above is important because nurses with more experience can develop skills and professional competences at work, which through professional performance can have an effect on better self-confidence among them (33).
It is important to note that managerial position did not prove to be a significant predictor of self-esteem, although previous research has indicated that there may be a positive relationship between higher job positions and self-esteem (34), as employees with high self-esteem feel competent and self-reliant, and have better productivity, which affects their career advancement (34). However, as the aforementioned research was not conducted on a sample of nurses, it is possible that there are specific factors in the nursing profession that influence the perception of self-esteem regardless of hierarchical position, and it is important to conduct further research that could shed light on the aforementioned uncertainties.
The third significant predictor of nurses’ self-esteem was shown to be emotional competence. There is no research on this topic on a sample of nurses, how- ever, the relationship of these constructs was inves- tigated on other samples of respondents and they were shown to be significant (35,36). The close re- lationship between emotional competence and the
affective aspect of self-awareness and psychological well-being — specifically, how individuals emotionally perceive their own worth and identity — may help ex- plain these outcomes. Positive emotions are linked to both general and individual self-esteem, and they can be sparked by comprehending and controlling emotions during the self-evaluation process (35,37).
As mentioned in the introduction, emotional compe- tence is important in interaction with other people,
i.e. it enables positive relationships with others. The above contributes to strengthening feelings of sup- port and acceptance, which are directly related to self-esteem (38,39). Emotional competence includes skills such as self-awareness, emotional regulation, social skills, and empathy (38,39) that enable nurses to build trust and quality relationships in the work- place with both colleagues and patients. Good com- munication and creation of a positive environment can help grow nurses’ self-esteem resulting from a better feeling at work (40). Emotional competence is perceived as a key concept pertaining to emotional, social, and behavioral adaptation, which enables nurses to effectively navigate various emotional, social, and behavioral challenges, thereby shielding them from emotional strain over time (41). These factors decrease the likelihood of experiencing emo- tional stress (42) and might lead to an improved self- view (42), as those with low self-esteem might not possess the coping skills needed to manage stressors from their environment (42). Therefore, the above in- dicates how important emotional competence can be in nursing work, and how it, along with self-esteem, can be a key factor in maintaining healthy relation- ships with colleagues and patients. Therefore, it is important to further research these constructs in order to gain better insight into the key aspects of their mutual connection.
Future research could focus on identifying specific mechanisms through which emotional competence influences the development and maintenance of self-esteem in nurses, as well as on the way in which both of these constructs contribute to job satisfac- tion and stress resistance. It would also be interesting to see how the above constructs can affect patient satisfaction with the quality of healthcare provided. Additionally, future research should explore profes- sional self-esteem, as it is a distinct construct from general and personal self-esteem. Given its stronger connection to the work environment, professional self-esteem could serve as a more precise criterion
for evaluating job-related predictors and their impact on employees’ well-being and performance.
One major limitation of the research is its online for- mat, which introduces potential bias as participation requires internet access and familiarity with navi- gating the questionnaire. Furthermore, completing the questionnaire online does not allow for personal contact with the researcher, reducing opportunities to clarify questions or verify the authenticity of re- sponses, ultimately affecting the overall quality of the study.
Consequently, it can be inferred that a notably larger proportion of nurses demonstrate elevated self-es- teem. Additionally, emotional competence has been identified as a key factor in predicting self-esteem among nurses, with the important sociodemographic predictors being education level and duration of em- ployment in the field.
Conceptualization (VPV, MN); Methodology (VPV, MN); Investigation (VPV, MN); Writing—original draft preparation (MM); Writing—review and editing (MM).
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The authors would like to thank all the participants.
This research received no external funding.
MacDonald G, Leary MR. Individual differences in self- esteem. In: Leary MR, Tangney JP, editors. Handbook of Self and Identity. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
Rosenberg, M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1965.
Muris P, Otgaar H. Self-esteem and self-compassion: a narrative review and meta-analysis on their links to psychological problems and well-being. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2023;16:2961-75. https://doi. org/10.2147/PRBM.S402455
Wilson TD, Dunn EW. Self knowledge: its limits, value and potential for improvement. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55(2):493-518. https://doi.org/10.1146/annu- rev.psych.55.090902.141954
Chang C, Yuan R, Chen J. Social support and depre- ssion among Chinese adolescents: The mediating roles of self-esteem and self-efficacy. Child. Youth Serv. Rev.2018;88:128-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. childyouth.2018.03.001
Celik CB, Odaci H. Does child abuse have an impact on self-esteem, depression, anxiety and stress conditions of individuals? Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2019;66(2):171-8. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020764019894618
Wigfield A, Eccles JS. Children’s competence beliefs, achievement values, and general self-esteem: chan- ge across elementary and middle school. J. Early Ado- lesc.1994;14(2):107–38. https://doi.org/10.1177% 2F027243169401400203
Barf HA, Post MW, Verhoef M, Jennekens-Schinkel A, Gooskens RH, Prevo AJ. Life satisfaction of yo- ung adults with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(6):458–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-
8749.2007.00458.x
Ou X, Chen Y, Liang Z, Wen S, Li S, Chen Y. Resilien- ce of nurses in isolation wards during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Psychol Health Med. 2020;26(1):98–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13
548506.2020.1861312
Neff KD. Self-compassion, self-esteem, and well-be- ing. Soc Personal Psychol Compass.2011;5(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00330.x
Randle J. Changes in self-esteem during a 3 year pre-registration diploma in higher education (nur- sing) programme. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2003;12(1):142-43. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-
2702.2003.00679.x
Dimitriadou A, Koukourikos K, Pizirtzidou E. The concept of self-esteem in nursing education and its impact on professional behaviour. Int. J. Caring Sci.2014;7(1):6-11.
Hohm E, Laucht M, Zohsel K, Schmidt MH, Es- ser G, Brandeis G, et al. Resilienz und Ressour- cen im Verlauf der Entwicklung. Kindheit und Entwicklung. 2017;2(4):230-39. German. https://doi. org/10.25932/publishup-43307
Saarni C. The development of emotional competence. New York: Guilford Press; 1999.
Kozub E, Brown L, Ecoff L. Strategies for success: cul- tivating emotional competence in the clinical nurse specialist role. Adv Crit Care. 2016; 27(2):145–51. https://doi.org/10.4037/aacnacc2016771
Morkel V, McLaughlin T. Promoting social and emoti- onal competencies in early childhood: strategies for teachers. Kairaranga. 2015;16(1):45-51. https://doi. org/10.54322/kairaranga.v16i1.194
Mayer JD, Salovey P. What is emotional intelligence? In: Salovey P, Sluyter DJ, editors. Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications. New York: Basic Books; 1997.
Kinman G, Grant L. Exploring stress resilience in tra- inee social workers: The role of emotional and soci- al competencies. Br J Soc Work. 2011;41(2):261–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq088
Zaff JF, Hair EC. The positive development of the self: Self-concept, self-esteem, and identity. In: Well-being: Positive development across the life course. Lawren- ce Erlbaum Associates Publishers; Psychology Press; 2003.
Jelić M. Provjera postavki teorije socijalnog identiteta na etničkim grupama [Master’s thesis]. Zagreb: Filo- zofski fakultet u Zagrebu; 2003. Available at: https:// www.bib.irb.hr/145139. Croatian.
Takšić V. Validacija konstrukta emocionalne inteligen- cije [Doktorska disertacija]. Zagreb: Filozofski fakultet u Zagrebu; 1998. Available at: https://www.bib.irb. hr/107316. Croatian.
Joy GV, Alomari AMA, Singh K, Hassan N, Mannethodi K, Kunjavara J, et al. Nurses’ self-esteem, self-com- passion and psychological resilience during COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs Open. 2023;10(7):4404-12. https:// doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1682
Radhakrishnan RV, Jain M, Mohanty CR, Jacob J, Shetty AP, Stephen S, et al. The perceived social stigma, self-es- teem, and its determinants among the health care pro- fessionals working in India during COVID 19 pandemic. Med J. Armed Forces India. 2021;77(Suppl 2):450–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.01.017
Liu Y, Yang C, Zou G. Self-esteem, job insecurity, and psy- chological distress among Chinese nurses. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-
021-00665-5
Arshad M, Zaidi SMIH, Mahmood K. Self-esteem & aca- demic performance among university students. Jour- nal of Education and Practice. 2015;6(1):156-62.
Nematollahi A, Pouran T, Marzieh A. The relation- ship between self-esteem and students ‘ academic
achievement and some parental demographic factors. Sch J App Med Sci. 2017;5(5):1758-64. https://doi. org/10.36347/sjams.2017.v05i05.009
Ayyash-Abdo H, Sánchez-Ruiz MJ. Subjective wellbeing and its relationship with academic achievement and multilinguality among Lebanese university students. Int. J. Psychol International. 2012;47(3):192-202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207594.2011.614616
Baumeister RF, Campbell JD, Krueger JI, Vohs KD. Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interper- sonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psy- chol Sci Public Interest. 2003;4(1):1-44. https://doi. org/10.1111/1529-1006.01431
Deci EL, Ryan RM. Intrinsic motivation and self-deter- mination in human behavior. New York: Springer Sci- ence & Business Media; 1985.
Hobfoll SE, Halbesleben J, Neveu JP, Westman M. Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their conse- quences. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2018;5:103–28. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- orgpsych-032117-104640
Krauss S, Orth U. Work experiences and self-esteem development: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. European Journal of Personality. 2022;36(6):849-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070211027142
Murray SL, Derrick JL, Leder S, Holmes JG. Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close re- lationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2008;94(3):429–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.3.429
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company; 1997.
Gómez-Jorge F, Díaz-Garrido E. The relation between Self- Esteem and Productivity: An analysis in higher education institutions. Front Psychol. 2023;13:1112437. https:// doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1112437
Coetzee M, Martins N, Basson J, Helene M. The relation- ship between personality preferences, self-esteem and emotional competence. SA J. Ind. Psychol. 2006;32(2):64-
83. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v32i2.233
Schoeps K, Tamarit A, Postigo Zegarra S, Montoya-Cas- tilla I. The long-term effects of emotional competencies and self-esteem on adolescents’ internalizing symptoms, Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed.). 2021;26(2),113-
22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2020.12.001
Battle, J. Culture – free self-esteem inventories for children and adults. Austin: Pro-Ed; 1992.
Bar-On R. The Bar-On model of emotional-social in- telligence (ESI). Psicothema. 2006;18(Suppl):13-25.
Goleman D. Working with Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books; 1998.
Howell RD, Bellenger DN, Wilcox JB. Self-esteem, role stress, and job satisfaction among marketing mana- gers. Journal of Business Research. 1987;15(1):71-
84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(87)90019-1
Schoeps K, Tamarit A, Postigo Zegarra S, Mon- toya-Castilla I. The long-term effects of emotional competencies and self-esteem on adolescents’ in- ternalizing symptoms. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 2021;26(2):113-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psi- coe.2020.12.001
O’Hara RE, Armeli S, Boynton MH, Tennen H. Emo- tional stress-reactivity and positive affect among college students: the role of depression history. Emotion. 2014;14(1):193-202. https://doi: 10.1037/ a0034217